What Anglo-Saxon Monasteries Have That Medieval Ones Don’t

DigVentures Lindisfarne

Lindisfarne Priory was built in the 12th century, 300 years after the monks fled their original monastery during Viking raids.

When you picture a monastery, what you see is probably medieval; all cloisters, gatehouses and soaring masonry. But they weren’t always like that, and Lindisfarne is the perfect example.

The North Sea island of Lindisfarne is home to a world-famous monastery whose ruins still stand today. But these ones are Medieval and there was in fact another one built by an Anglo-Saxon king named Oswald 500 years before it.

Originally founded in AD 635,Oswald had been educated at Iona and established his monastery in the Irish tradition. Itquickly became the heart of the great Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Northumbria, until it was sacked by the Vikings in AD 793. Its inhabitants eventually fled and it wasn’t rebuilt until AD1000-1100s.

In the intervening years, religion and monasticism changed drastically, and so did the architecture that went with it. While medieval monasteries tend to be compact, stone-built and laid out according to a pretty standardised ground-plan,  Anglo-Saxon ones were more spread out, often built of wood (at least initially), and did not conform to any kind of rigid ground plan – its constituent buildings could be almost anywhere within the monastery bounds.

DigVentures’ crowdfunded excavation is all set to try and locate Lindisfarne’s original monastery, but it will be a very different task to looking for a Medieval one. Here’s why.

1. They had no cloisters

Cloisters are the architectural manifestation of the theological concept of ‘enclaustration’ (withdrawing from the world to worship) and probably one of the first things you think of when you picture a monastery. And yet the earliest examples don’t appear until the end of the 8th century in Carolingian Francia at places like Lorsch, or until the 9th century in places like Inden in Germany and St Wandrille in Normandy. In England, they don’t seem to have arrived until the Saxo-Norman revival of monasticism in the late 10th and 11th centuries, although no one seems to know exactly where the first one was – if you have the answer to this, please do let us know!

2. They were closer to nature

Rather than having cloisters to shut them off from the world, the boundaries of earlier monasteries, like Iona, Lindisfarne and even Lyminge, were more often defined by natural features in the landscape – islands, headlands and river bends were all popular, and they all brought the added benefit of access to the ‘whale roads’ of contemporary writing. Hilltops were also common, literally raising the monastery above the day-to-day world – as at recently excavated Lyminge, Kent, which was located on the end of a chalk spur overlooking a natural spring. The case of Lindisfarne is also a classic, combining a coastal island location, and a headland on the island defining three sides of the site; finding the fourth boundary feature would be a wonderful discovery.

3. They had more space

Overall the early monastic settlements were more varied and dispersed in layout, and often spread out over much larger areas of land than later ones. Within, there would usually have been more open ground than one might expect, with buildings spaced some distance apart, and inner zones for worship, habitation and light industry divided by earthwork boundaries.

4. They had more wood and less stone

The majority of buildings at most monasteries were built using timber until after the Norman Conquest and it was often the church that was built in stone first, as at Lindisfarne and at Lyminge. However, hard evidence for the structures and layout of Saxon and Norman monasteries in England is still limited and all future clues will be important.

5. They argued about Celtic vs. Roman style

In the AD 600s, the big question facing the Church in England was whether to retain the native Celtic church or move towards Rome. At the synod of Whitby in AD 664, the pendulum swung decisively toward Rome. Monasteries like Lindisfarne, which had been established in the Celtic tradition, found themselves on the front line. From this point onwards, Roman and Benedictine ideas spread rapidly. St Benedict had laid down his regula (rule) for monastic life in sometime between AD 480-547. The structures and rhythm of the Rule undoubtedly influenced monastic architecture in the centuries to come, accommodating the communal prayer eight times daily with dormitory buildings directly connected to the church, for example.

6. They had no established Monastic orders

It was still another few hundred years until we can see recognisable Benedictine rule being applied in England around the 10th and 11th centuries, or for the other monastic orders familiar from the high Medieval period to arrive. By the end of the 13th century, as well as Benedictines there were Cluniacs, Carthusians, Cistertians, Augustinians, Premonstratensians, and Gilbertines in England – and that is not including the Orders of friars, the Dominicans (Blackfriars), Fransiscans (Greyfriars) and Carmelites (Whitefriars). Monasticism in the high Medieval period was more regulated, and more complicated.

7. They had more women involved

Double monasteries of monks and nuns were much more common in the Anglo-Saxon period than later, as were Abbesses leading them. Hilda at Whitby is a famous example, as is Queen Ethelburga of Kent at Lyminge. Overall, women had a more equal and obvious presence than later. In the case of Lindisfarne, a number of female gravestones, including one for a woman called Osgyth, have been found. Who these women were and the nature of their place in the community is currently still a mystery.

8. And finally, there were a few things they had in common…

The key differences notwithstanding, many features of later Medieval monasteries were present in an earlier, simpler or smaller-scale form in Anglo-Saxon monasteries. For example, early stained glass windows appeared at some of the richest monasteries, such as Jarrow in Northumbria, although they were much smaller than later on, with no firm evidence for pictorial designs. Likewise, the habits worn by monks (tunics and scapulae of undyed wool in the Anglo-Saxon period) and hair styles (Roman-style tonsured hair) changed little; the relative wealth and luxuries (wine, precious metal plate, silks, spices, pigments), the libraries and scriptoria, and the focus on hospitality and agriculture as well as worship.

See what DigVentures has found at Lindisfarne so far.

Love archaeology?

DigVentures crowdfunds archaeological projects that everyone can be part of, in the UK and overseas. With help from people all over the world, we investigate the past and publish our discoveries online for free. Become a DigVentures Subscriber and be part of great archaeology - all year round!

Rose Broadley

Written by Rose Broadley

Rose is a part-time PhD student and freelance glass specialist, who loves black coffee and fresh air, and is currently juggling a final thesis draft, an admin job and two small children (not literally, however tempting!).

Read more from Rose Broadley +

Get Dig Mail

Keep up with the latest fun, facts & features from the world of archaeology.

Easy opt-out at any time - Privacy Policy

Archaeology / In Your Hands

Courses for anyone who wants to learn more about archaeology, and have fun while they're doing it!

Archaeology Courses

Our fab archaeology merch: dig team tee-shirts, Tatty Devine jewellery range, tote bags, and more!

Archaeology Shop