4 Thoughts on Time Team’s Final Episode

Raksha Dave

As Time Team gets set to sail into the sunset this Sunday with one last documentary special, DigVentures’ Field School Manager Raksha Dave shares her thoughts on why the end of Time Team doesn’t have to mean the end of an era.

So that’s it. Unless the campaign to produce one last dig in memory of Mick Aston succeeds, this Sunday’s documentary special on ‘The Boats That Built Britain’ looks set to be the last new Time Team episode ever.

Sad, but does that mean we’re about to return to the bad old days when there was no archaeology at all on telly? I hope not. Here’s four things that the next generation of archaeological programming would be absolutely mad to miss out on:

1. A revolution in the type of archaeology we see on TV

True to form, this last episode on Bronze Age Britain focuses not on its elaborate treasures, decorative armour or monumental structures, but instead on the discovery of a 3,500 year old oak-plank boat six feet below the streets of Dover. It unlocks the story of its pioneering seafarers who straddled English Channel while Stonehenge was still in use and before King Tut reigned in Egypt.

Instead of talking heads focusing on classical civilisations, Time Team shifted attention to the less glamorous, but no less fascinating, archaeology we might find in our own back yards. There are great stories in the everyday too, and that’s something I hope programmers don’t forget. There won’t be a King under every car park, or enough dead celebrities of any kind worth digging up to keep the public tuning in. This country is a layer cake of amazing archaeology, everywhere.

2. People are as interested in the process of discovery as anything else

The power of Time Team was that it completely de-mystified archaeology as an academic discipline. It was like archaeology reality TV; it was about the characters and how they came to their conclusions.

In this last episode we see Tony Robinson and Phil Harding join the team attempting to reconstruct and, after a couple of failed attempts, successfully launch the Dover Boat. Things can go wrong, they don’t always have the answers, but you do always see the process they use to try and work things out. Expertise isn’t just about ‘knowing’ and ‘telling’; ‘showing’ is just as important as anything else. One of the things we’ve learned through our work at DigVentures is that people want to know more about the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of archaeology than we ever realised – archaeological programmers mustn’t assume that a big reveal at the end is the only thing that holds any interest.

3. Archaeology faces a changing broadcast climate

Back to the subject of the final episode – seafaring is just a small part of Britain’s Bronze Age boat-building history. As the Bronze Age dawned, rising waters were gradually inundating the area around Flag Fen where I was working with DigVentures in 2012.

The emergence of this new wetland environment did not displace people, it produced a new way of life – as the ground became increasingly waterlogged and impassable on foot, causeways, platforms and man-made walkways – the features that are so uniquely ‘Flag Fen’ – started to appear.

In fact, we were just getting ready to start digging when, no more than a mile down the road at Must Farm, archaeologists from Cambridge Archaeological Unit made an incredible discovery: six submerged boats. Both sites represent adaptations to a landscape fast disappearing beneath rising waters, and provide compelling evidence of a mass colonisation of the recently formed wetlands, which made me think:

Archaeological projects are increasingly producing their own videos, blogs, and other ways of sharing what goes on behind-the-scenes online. They are taking a DIY approach and colonising a new environment. The era of televised excavations is not over, but is beginning all over again by other means. And if we can do it, so too, surely, can the major broadcasters.

4. Public participation in archaeology

But perhaps the most important piece of Time Team’s legacy is the fact that people don’t just want to watch archaeology, they want to take part.

Time Team was the first to pioneer public engagement in archaeology, often encouraging people to dig test pits in their own gardens. At the time many professionals hailed it as irresponsible – how could the public possibly be trusted with a trowel?! But now, it’s common practice and you can’t run an archaeological project, not even a commercial one, without involving the public. You can even see the impact on TV in other subject areas – programmes like Springwatch and Sky at Night all encourage people to have a go and to get involved in ‘citizen science’.

Fortunately, there’s an increasing number of ways you can get stuck in with archaeology, whether that’s joining a community dig, supporting crowdfunded projects or helping out with crowdsourced research online. DigVentures’ recent project, Digital Dig Team, was all about encouraging participation in archaeology – whether on site digging with us, or from the comfort of your home or wherever else you can access the internet.

So, if broadcasters have any sense, this won’t be the end of such programmes for archaeology, it’s more a question of what new formats will spring up in its wake and how long a hiatus there will be before broadcasters remember how important, and popular, archaeological programming really is.

Time Team: The Boats That Built Britain will air on Channel 4 at 8:00pm Sunday 7th September 2014

Archaeology in your inbox?!

Want to join a dig? Learn more about archaeology? Join our email list for a monthly digest of our most popular stories, plus alerts for any digs, events, or courses you can join.

Join the list
Raksha Dave

Written by Raksha Dave

A long-time member of Channel 4's Time Team, Raksha Dave is one of the country's best loved archaeologists. Unequivocally, she has never, and will never, be married to Matt Williams.

Read more from Raksha Dave +

Comments (6)

  1. Karie says:

    I hope someone will post the last episode of TT on You Tube or something so we Americans can watch!

  2. Roy says:

    Mick Aston deserves a Time Team special to honour his life. Raksha, it would be lovely if you would support the campaign.

  3. Meg Molyneux says:

    Please can we have more time team, it’s been my favourite programme of all time since the first episode. Understandably, some of the excellent presenters may feel they’ve done their bit but younger expert archaeologists would surely be up for it. Please don’t let it die.

  4. Peter Herbert says:

    The Dover Boat was a genuine special. What has been learned from that experiment must be of great value.
    This should certainly not be the end. What Mick Aston and all you wonderful people achieved is immeasurable. You created a completely new way of conveying history and the valaue of what still lies in the ground to a public that had largely forgotten what archaeology was all about.
    I am old enough to remember Mortimer Wheeler and also the rather ill-advised hack into Silbury Hill. Time Team blew away the dust and cobwebs. Sadly, the producers started to have ideas way beyond its original remit and I felt there was a serious danger of the programme losing both its grasp on its purpose and the hungry public. It was always the simple settings that worked best, even though some spectacular big digs coulod grip the imagination for a whole weekend and helped to really put the team on the map.
    There have been one or two desultory attempts on other channels to plug the gap but they were so dully and patronisingly presented as to lose all impact. (The ghastly rediscovery of Richard III is perhaps the worst example of all).
    The key components of expert, communicative archaeologists with Tony Robinson as Everyman was perfect.
    I hope someone can persuade some TV baron that it can still be done to advantage.

  5. Rick says:

    Raksha, I have binge watched Time Team for the last 2 weeks, I have watched every episode you have posted on You Tube. Something you all have never discussed on any of the episodes!! Why is everything you dig 1 to 2 meters deep in clay and dirt? The average process of loam and soil is about 1 inch per 100 years. But you in England seem to get 10 inches per 100 years. Not counting things lost in rivers and flood plains. But not every hill and dale is in a flood plain. And, watching you and the other diggers are really scrapping the hardest subsoil ever! So can you please explain why you have to dig through 1 to 2 meters of soil to get to a roman wall or a Bronze Age barrow? Thanks for your efforts and your work. Rick

Show More

Leave a comment

Get the DigVentures Newsletter

Sign up to discover opportunities to get involved in archaeology - in your area, and beyond!

Easy opt-out at any time - Privacy Policy

Archaeology / In Your Hands
  • Heritage Lottery Fund
  • CIfA

See all the archaeology digs, talks, festivals and other events coming up at DigVentures

Learn more about digging up the past and have fun while you're doing it!

We're connecting people who love archaeology, with opportunities to do archaeology.

Archaeology experiences and other perfect presents for people who love the past.